NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 160W)
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-III
Clock Speeds
1005 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
-
144
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.80 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
160W
TDP
45W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
G71
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
90 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.278 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0
