NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (160W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000
+211%
7.119 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1005 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
1536
144
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
GK104
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
