NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA GRID K1
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 4GB VRAM GRID K1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000
+2083%
7.119 TFLOPS
GRID K1
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1005 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
192
144
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
GK107
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-450-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
