NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (160W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000
+592%
7.119 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1005 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
36
SM Count
14
2304
Shading Units
448
144
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
48
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
238W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
GF100
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
