NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
+415%
5.299 TFLOPS
Quadro 6000
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Dec 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
945 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
747 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
143.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
14
1920
Shading Units
448
120
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
48
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
204W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GF100
N19E-Q1-KA-K1
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
