NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla K20X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 249.6GB/s)
Lower TDP (80W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20X 's Advantages
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
+34%
5.299 TFLOPS
Tesla K20X
3.935 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
945 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
1920
Shading Units
2688
120
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
48
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
235W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GK110
N19E-Q1-KA-K1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
