NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
4.666 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded
+206%
14.31 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
5349
RTX A4500 Embedded
+84%
9884
Blender
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
1623
RTX A4500 Embedded
+141%
3920
OctaneBench
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
34
RTX A4500 Embedded
+1317%
482
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Base Clock
510 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
46
1920
Shading Units
5888
120
TMUs
184
64
ROPs
96
240
Tensor Cores
184
30
RT Cores
46
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
145.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
9.331 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
4.666 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
145.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GA104
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
