NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (1627MHz vs 1215MHz)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
4.666 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Embedded
+42%
6.664 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
+25%
1623
RTX A1000 Embedded
1297
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Base Clock
1192 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
16
1920
Shading Units
2048
120
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
48
240
Tensor Cores
64
30
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
145.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
9.331 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
4.666 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
145.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
445 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
