NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 58% (1215MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
+31%
4.666 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
+158%
5349
Quadro K5200
2072
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
+253%
3324
Quadro K5200
941
Blender
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
+453%
1623
Quadro K5200
293
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
1920
Shading Units
2304
120
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
48
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
145.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
9.331 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.666 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
145.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GK110B
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
