NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1680 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
+650%
4.666 TFLOPS
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
512bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
30
1920
Shading Units
240
120
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
145.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
9.331 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.666 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
145.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
800W
-
Suggested PSU
1200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
