Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1354MHz vs 1335MHz)
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 40W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded +294%
5.468 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1266 MHz
Base Clock
435 MHz
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

21.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
43.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
21.66 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
1386 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
43.33 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GA107S
-
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy