NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1612MHz vs 1354MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
+495%
8.253 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro P620
130
RTX A2000 Embedded
+1439%
2001
OctaneBench
Quadro P620
25
RTX A2000 Embedded
+984%
271
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1266 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
20
512
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
43.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
21.66 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
1386 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
43.33 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
132 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
