NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 208.0GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000
+258%
12.63 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c
3.524 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro P6000
+223%
178
Tesla K20c
55
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Pascal
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1506 MHz
Base Clock
-
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
2496
240
TMUs
208
96
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
GK110
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
