NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA GRID K520
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 4GB VRAM GRID K520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K520 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000
+451%
12.63 TFLOPS
GRID K520
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Pascal
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1506 MHz
Base Clock
-
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
1536
240
TMUs
128
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
GK104
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
