Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 and 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1557MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 900W)
NVIDIA Tesla S2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P600 +16%
1.196 TFLOPS
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1329 MHz
Base Clock
-
1557 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
448
24
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

24.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
37.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
18.68 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1196 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
37.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
900W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy