Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1557MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P600 +10%
1.196 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1329 MHz
Base Clock
-
1557 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

24.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
37.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
18.68 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1196 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
37.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy