NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
We compared a Professional market GPU: 4GB VRAM Quadro P600 Mobile and a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 41% (1620MHz vs 1150MHz)
200 additional rendering cores
Intel UHD Graphics 630 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (15W vs 40W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P600 Mobile
+194%
1.244 TFLOPS
UHD Graphics 630
0.423 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P600 Mobile
+173%
1174
UHD Graphics 630
430
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P600 Mobile
+182%
559
UHD Graphics 630
198
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Apr 2020
Quadro Pascal-M
Generation
HD Graphics
Professional
Type
Integrated
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
1430 MHz
Base Clock
350 MHz
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
System Shared
GDDR5
Memory Type
System Shared
128bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
184
24
TMUs
23
16
ROPs
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
25.92 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.450 GPixel/s
38.88 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.45 GTexel/s
19.44 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
846.4 GFLOPS
1244 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
423.2 GFLOPS
38.88 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
105.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
Comet Lake GT2
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm+++
3.3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
132 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
