NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile and 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1800MHz vs 1747MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 230.9GB/s)
8192 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Mobile
8.945 TFLOPS
RTX A6000
+332%
38.71 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Oct 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1557 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1747 MHz
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
84
2560
Shading Units
10752
160
TMUs
336
64
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
201.6 GPixel/s
279.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
604.8 GTexel/s
139.8 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
38.71 TFLOPS
8.945 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.71 TFLOPS
279.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
604.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
