NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 50% (1747MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Mobile
+400%
8.945 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1557 MHz
Base Clock
796 MHz
1747 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
768
160
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
279.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
139.8 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.945 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
279.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
