NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1747MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Mobile
+5490%
8.945 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Feb 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1747 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
8
2560
Shading Units
64
160
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
279.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
139.8 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.945 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
279.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
70W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
