NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1569MHz vs 1291MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+170%
8.033 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+133%
126
Quadro P2000 Mobile
54
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Feb 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1316 MHz
Base Clock
1291 MHz
1569 MHz
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
9
2560
Shading Units
1152
160
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
100.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
251.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
125.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
8.033 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
251.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GP106
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
