NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (1569MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 211.6GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+88%
8.033 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000
4.252 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+44%
126
Quadro M5000
87
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jun 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1316 MHz
Base Clock
861 MHz
1569 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
211.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
2048
160
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
100.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
66.43 GPixel/s
251.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.9 GTexel/s
125.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.033 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.252 TFLOPS
251.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
132.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
GM204-875-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
