NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+1304%
8.033 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+950%
126
Quadro K2000M
12
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1316 MHz
Base Clock
-
1569 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
384
160
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
100.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
251.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
125.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.033 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
251.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
