Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P520 Mobile and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1612MHz vs 1493MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P520 Mobile
1.147 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded +619%
8.253 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro P520 Mobile
74
RTX A2000 Embedded +2604%
2001
OctaneBench
Quadro P520 Mobile
19
RTX A2000 Embedded +1326%
271

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1303 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
1493 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
3
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
35.83 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
17.92 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
1147 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
35.83 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
74 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net