Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K200

NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P520 Mobile and 256MB VRAM GRID K200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1493MHz
Lower TDP (18W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P520 Mobile
1.147 TFLOPS
GRID K200 +99%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1303 MHz
Base Clock
-
1493 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
1536
24
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
35.83 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
17.92 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1147 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
35.83 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

18W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy