NVIDIA Quadro P5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1733MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.5GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (180W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5000
+763%
8.873 TFLOPS
Tesla C2070
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1607 MHz
Base Clock
-
1733 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
747 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
288.5GB/s
Bandwidth
143.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
14
2560
Shading Units
448
160
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
110.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
277.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
138.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.873 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
277.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
180W
TDP
238W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GF100
GP104-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
