NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P400 and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P400 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1252MHz vs 1215MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 32.06GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P400
0.641 TFLOPS
Quadro P3000 Mobile
+385%
3.11 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro P400
9
Quadro P3000 Mobile
+522%
56
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1228 MHz
Base Clock
1088 MHz
1252 MHz
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
32.06GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
10
256
Shading Units
1280
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.03 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
58.32 GPixel/s
20.03 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.20 GTexel/s
10.02 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
48.60 GFLOPS
641.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.110 TFLOPS
20.03 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
97.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GP104
GP107-825-KA-A1
GPU Variant
N17E-Q1-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
