Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q and 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 SXM2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1480MHz vs 1404MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Max Q
5.032 TFLOPS
Tesla P100 SXM2 +110%
10.61 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1139 MHz
Base Clock
1328 MHz
1404 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
56
-
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
3584
112
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

89.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
142.1 GPixel/s
157.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
331.5 GTexel/s
78.62 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.22 TFLOPS
5.032 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.61 TFLOPS
157.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.304 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GP100
-
GPU Variant
GP100-890-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.0
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy