NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1404MHz
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Max Q
+277%
5.032 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1139 MHz
Base Clock
-
1404 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
16
1792
Shading Units
512
112
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
157.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
78.62 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.032 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
157.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GF110
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
