NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1404MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Max Q
+389%
5.032 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1139 MHz
Base Clock
-
1404 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
14
1792
Shading Units
448
112
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
157.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
78.62 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.032 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
157.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
238W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
