NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1404MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Max Q
+1443%
5.032 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1139 MHz
Base Clock
-
1404 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
192
112
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
157.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
78.62 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.032 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
157.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
