Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1785MHz vs 1404MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Max Q +37%
5.032 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1139 MHz
Base Clock
1575 MHz
1404 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

89.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
157.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
78.62 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
5.032 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
157.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
60W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy