NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1600MHz vs 1404MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
14592 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Max Q
5.032 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+941%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1139 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1404 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
192bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
16384
112
TMUs
1024
64
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
157.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
78.62 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
5.032 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
157.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
2400W
-
Suggested PSU
2800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
16 nm
Process Size
10 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
100 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
