NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2200 and 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 230W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1665MHz vs 1493MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 200.2GB/s)
8960 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2200
3.822 TFLOPS
RTX A5500
+792%
34.1 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2200
3410
RTX A5500
+365%
15878
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P2200
1536
RTX A5500
+421%
8016
Blender
Quadro P2200
322
RTX A5500
+1240%
4316
OctaneBench
Quadro P2200
63
RTX A5500
+846%
596
Graphics Card
Jun 2019
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1080 MHz
1493 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR6
160bit
Memory Bus
384bit
200.2GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
80
1280
Shading Units
10240
80
TMUs
320
40
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
59.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
159.8 GPixel/s
119.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
532.8 GTexel/s
59.72 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
34.10 TFLOPS
3.822 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
34.10 TFLOPS
119.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
532.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
230W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
