NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2200 and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1493MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 200.2GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2200
+8%
3.822 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c
3.524 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro P2200
+14%
63
Tesla K20c
55
Graphics Card
Jun 2019
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1493 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
320bit
200.2GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
2496
80
TMUs
208
40
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
59.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
119.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
59.72 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.822 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
119.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GK110
-
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
