NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2200 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 94% (1493MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.2GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 5GB)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2200
+7%
3.822 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2200
+64%
3410
Quadro K5200
2072
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P2200
+63%
1536
Quadro K5200
941
Blender
Quadro P2200
+9%
322
Quadro K5200
293
Graphics Card
Jun 2019
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1493 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
200.2GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
192
40
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
59.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
119.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
59.72 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.822 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
119.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GK110B
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
