Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1480MHz vs 1260MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Max Q +517%
18.71 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
585 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1260 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
58
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
7424
64
TMUs
232
40
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.0 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
292.3 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.71 TFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.71 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
292.3 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GA103
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
22 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy