Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA L40 CNX

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA L40 CNX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 24GB VRAM L40 CNX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
NVIDIA L40 CNX 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 67% (2475MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
17152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
L40 CNX +2868%
89.97 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Oct 2022
Quadro
Generation
Tesla Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
1005 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
2475 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
160bit
Memory Bus
384bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
142
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
18176
64
TMUs
568
40
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
475.2 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1406 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
89.97 TFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
89.97 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1406 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
AD102
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
AD102-???-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
4 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
608 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy