NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1136 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+12830%
2.974 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370
0.023 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
2
1152
Shading Units
16
72
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.440 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.880 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 GFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
80 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
