Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1395MHz vs 1291MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 4 +236%
9.999 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Feb 2019
Release Date
Jan 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1291 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
9
SM Count
56
1152
Shading Units
3584
72
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net