NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1700MHz vs 1291MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
12160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250
+1421%
45.26 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
208
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
13312
72
TMUs
832
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Pascal
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
N/A
