NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 47W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000
+11041%
1.894 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370 LP
0.017 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1266 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
5
SM Count
1
640
Shading Units
8
40
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
47.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
29.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.28 GFLOPS
59.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
47W
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
G98
GP107-860-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
