Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1480MHz
Lower TDP (47W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
7040 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000
1.894 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +629%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1266 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
7680
40
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
120
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

47.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
29.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
59.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GP107-860-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
14 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
8 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

47W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy