NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
2040 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded
+25938%
5.468 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2009
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
435 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
16
8
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
