Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA GRID K1

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA GRID K1

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 4GB VRAM GRID K1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GRID K1 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
184 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
GRID K1 +1452%
0.326 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

May 2009
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro NVS
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
695 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
192
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

23W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-450-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net