NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 8GB VRAM GRID M10 8Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1306MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
632 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
GRID M10 8Q
+7861%
1.672 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2009
Release Date
May 2016
Quadro NVS
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1033 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
640
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.90 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.24 GTexel/s
-
-
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.672 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
52.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
GM107-570-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
