NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M620 Mobile and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (1335MHz vs 977MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 30W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M620 Mobile
1 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded
+446%
5.468 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
756 MHz
Base Clock
435 MHz
977 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
512
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
15.63 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
31.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
31.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
