NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M620 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock977MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 42W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M620 Mobile
+1392%
1 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
756 MHz
Base Clock
-
977 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
512
Shading Units
32
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
15.63 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
31.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
31.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
