NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M620 Mobile and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 600W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 64% (1600MHz vs 977MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
15872 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M620 Mobile
1 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1550
+5143%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
756 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
977 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
16384
32
TMUs
1024
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
15.63 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
31.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
31.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
600W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
100 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
