NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 and 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 49% (1550MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 211.6GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000
4.252 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1100
+422%
22.22 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
861 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
211.6GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
7168
128
TMUs
448
64
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
204 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
66.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
132.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
694.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.22 TFLOPS
4.252 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.22 TFLOPS
132.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.22 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
GM204-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
100 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
